Home › Compare › Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6
A straight cost comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.6 (xAI Grok), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified October 2026.
Rate-by-rate comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $10 | $2 | Grok 4.6 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.25 | $0.50 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Cache write / 1M | $12.50 | — | Grok 4.6 |
| Output / 1M | $50 | $6 | Grok 4.6 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 500,000 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Batch API | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Long-context tier | None | > 200,000 | — |
For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.
Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output
| Model | Blended cost | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | $22.50 | +$19 |
| Grok 4.6 | $3.50 | Cheaper |
Three workloads, two bills
| Workload | Claude Fable 5.1 | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support chat 1,000 requests · 4K input / 600 output | $70 | $11.60 | Grok 4.6 |
| RAG with caching 1,000 requests · 50K input (45K cached) / 1K output | $112 | $38.57 | Grok 4.6 |
| Nightly batch job 10,000 requests · 10K input / 2K output | $1000 | $160 | Grok 4.6 |
Which one should you pick?
Claude Fable 5.1 wins on none of the three workloads above, while Grok 4.6 wins on support chat, cached RAG, nightly batch job.
Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($10 vs $2); output rate ($50 vs $6); cached-input rate ($0.25 vs $0.50); cache-write rate ($12.50 vs —); context window (1,000,000 vs 500,000); long-context tier (none vs yes, above 200,000).
Batch mode is available on Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.6, which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.
FAQ
Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than Grok 4.6?
On a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, Grok 4.6 is cheaper by 84% ($3.50 vs $22.50). The gap changes for cache-heavy prompts and for batch jobs, as the workload table shows.
Which handles longer prompts, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 has the larger context window (1,000,000 vs 500,000 tokens). Watch the long-context threshold on Grok 4.6: rates rise once input passes it.
Do both models support prompt caching?
Claude Fable 5.1 bills cached reads at $0.25 per 1M; Grok 4.6 at $0.50.