Verified October 2026

Home › Compare › Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.3

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.3

A straight cost comparison of Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Google Gemini) and Grok 4.3 (xAI Grok), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified October 2026.

$0.30Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite input / 1M
$1.25Grok 4.3 input / 1M
51%Blended price gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteCheaper blended

Rate-by-rate comparison

USD per 1M tokens · October 2026
MetricGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGrok 4.3Winner
Input / 1M$0.30$1.25Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.20Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Cache write / 1M——Tie
Output / 1M$2.50$2.50Tie
Context window1,000,0001,000,000Tie
Batch APIYesYesTie
Long-context tierNone> 200,000—

For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.

Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output

ModelBlended costDifference
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.925Cheaper
Grok 4.3$1.88+$0.95

Three workloads, two bills

WorkloadGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGrok 4.3Winner
Support chat
1,000 requests · 4K input / 600 output
$2.70$6.50Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
RAG with caching
1,000 requests · 50K input (45K cached) / 1K output
$5.36$17.80Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Nightly batch job
10,000 requests · 10K input / 2K output
$40$87.50Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Which one should you pick?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite wins on support chat, cached RAG, nightly batch job, while Grok 4.3 wins on none of the three workloads above.

Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($0.30 vs $1.25); cached-input rate ($0.03 vs $0.20); long-context tier (none vs yes, above 200,000).

Batch mode is available on Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Grok 4.3, which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Grok 4.3?

On a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper by 51% ($0.925 vs $1.88). The gap changes for cache-heavy prompts and for batch jobs, as the workload table shows.

Which handles longer prompts, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.3?

Both models share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Watch the long-context threshold on Grok 4.3: rates rise once input passes it.

Do both models support prompt caching?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite bills cached reads at $0.03 per 1M; Grok 4.3 at $0.20.

Related comparisons

Run your own token volumes