Verified October 2026

Home › Compare › Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

A straight cost comparison of Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google Gemini) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google Gemini), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified October 2026.

$1.50Gemini 3.5 Flash input / 1M
$1.25Gemini 2.5 Pro input / 1M
TieBlended price gap
EqualCheaper blended

Rate-by-rate comparison

USD per 1M tokens · October 2026
MetricGemini 3.5 FlashGemini 2.5 ProWinner
Input / 1M$1.50$1.25Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cached input / 1M$0.15$0.125Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cache write / 1M——Tie
Output / 1M$9$10Gemini 3.5 Flash
Context window1,000,0001,000,000Tie
Batch APIYesYesTie
Long-context tierNone> 200,000—

For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.

Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output

ModelBlended costDifference
Gemini 3.5 Flash$3.75Tie
Gemini 2.5 Pro$3.75Tie

Three workloads, two bills

WorkloadGemini 3.5 FlashGemini 2.5 ProWinner
Support chat
1,000 requests · 4K input / 600 output
$11.40$11Gemini 2.5 Pro
RAG with caching
1,000 requests · 50K input (45K cached) / 1K output
$23.31$21.93Gemini 2.5 Pro
Nightly batch job
10,000 requests · 10K input / 2K output
$165$163Gemini 2.5 Pro

Which one should you pick?

Gemini 3.5 Flash wins on none of the three workloads above, while Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on support chat, cached RAG, nightly batch job.

Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($1.50 vs $1.25); output rate ($9 vs $10); cached-input rate ($0.15 vs $0.125); long-context tier (none vs yes, above 200,000).

Batch mode is available on Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro, which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

No — they are priced identically at $3.75 on a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, with the same per-token rates. Choose on context window, throughput or output quality instead.

Which handles longer prompts, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Both models share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Watch the long-context threshold on Gemini 2.5 Pro: rates rise once input passes it.

Do both models support prompt caching?

Gemini 3.5 Flash bills cached reads at $0.15 per 1M; Gemini 2.5 Pro at $0.125.

Related comparisons

Run your own token volumes