Verified October 2026

Home › Compare › Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.3

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.3

A straight cost comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google Gemini) and Grok 4.3 (xAI Grok), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified October 2026.

$0.75Gemini 3.7 Flash input / 1M
$1.25Grok 4.3 input / 1M
10%Blended price gap
Gemini 3.7 FlashCheaper blended

Rate-by-rate comparison

USD per 1M tokens · October 2026
MetricGemini 3.7 FlashGrok 4.3Winner
Input / 1M$0.75$1.25Gemini 3.7 Flash
Cached input / 1M$0.075$0.20Gemini 3.7 Flash
Cache write / 1M——Tie
Output / 1M$3.75$2.50Grok 4.3
Context window1,000,0001,000,000Tie
Batch APIYesYesTie
Long-context tier> 200,000> 200,000—

For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.

Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output

ModelBlended costDifference
Gemini 3.7 Flash$1.69Cheaper
Grok 4.3$1.88+$0.188

Three workloads, two bills

WorkloadGemini 3.7 FlashGrok 4.3Winner
Support chat
1,000 requests · 4K input / 600 output
$5.25$6.50Gemini 3.7 Flash
RAG with caching
1,000 requests · 50K input (45K cached) / 1K output
$10.91$17.80Gemini 3.7 Flash
Nightly batch job
10,000 requests · 10K input / 2K output
$75$87.50Gemini 3.7 Flash

Which one should you pick?

Gemini 3.7 Flash wins on support chat, cached RAG, nightly batch job, while Grok 4.3 wins on none of the three workloads above.

Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($0.75 vs $1.25); output rate ($3.75 vs $2.50); cached-input rate ($0.075 vs $0.20).

Batch mode is available on Gemini 3.7 Flash and Grok 4.3, which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper than Grok 4.3?

On a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper by 10% ($1.69 vs $1.88). The gap changes for cache-heavy prompts and for batch jobs, as the workload table shows.

Which handles longer prompts, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Grok 4.3?

Both models share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Watch the long-context threshold on Gemini 3.7 Flash and Grok 4.3: rates rise once input passes it.

Do both models support prompt caching?

Gemini 3.7 Flash bills cached reads at $0.075 per 1M; Grok 4.3 at $0.20.

Related comparisons

Run your own token volumes