Verified October 2026

Home › Compare › GPT-5.4 mini vs GPT-4.1

GPT-5.4 mini vs GPT-4.1

A straight cost comparison of GPT-5.4 mini (OpenAI) and GPT-4.1 (OpenAI), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified October 2026.

$0.75GPT-5.4 mini input / 1M
$2GPT-4.1 input / 1M
53%Blended price gap
GPT-5.4 miniCheaper blended

Rate-by-rate comparison

USD per 1M tokens · October 2026
MetricGPT-5.4 miniGPT-4.1Winner
Input / 1M$0.75$2GPT-5.4 mini
Cached input / 1M$0.075$0.50GPT-5.4 mini
Cache write / 1M——Tie
Output / 1M$4.50$8GPT-5.4 mini
Context window400,0001,047,576GPT-4.1
Batch APIYesYesTie
Long-context tierNoneNone—

For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.

Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output

ModelBlended costDifference
GPT-5.4 mini$1.88Cheaper
GPT-4.1$4+$2.13

Three workloads, two bills

WorkloadGPT-5.4 miniGPT-4.1Winner
Support chat
1,000 requests · 4K input / 600 output
$5.70$12.80GPT-5.4 mini
RAG with caching
1,000 requests · 50K input (45K cached) / 1K output
$11.66$40.57GPT-5.4 mini
Nightly batch job
10,000 requests · 10K input / 2K output
$82.50$180GPT-5.4 mini

Which one should you pick?

GPT-5.4 mini wins on support chat, cached RAG, nightly batch job, while GPT-4.1 wins on none of the three workloads above.

Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($0.75 vs $2); output rate ($4.50 vs $8); cached-input rate ($0.075 vs $0.50); context window (400,000 vs 1,047,576).

Batch mode is available on GPT-5.4 mini and GPT-4.1, which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.4 mini cheaper than GPT-4.1?

On a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper by 53% ($1.88 vs $4). The gap changes for cache-heavy prompts and for batch jobs, as the workload table shows.

Which handles longer prompts, GPT-5.4 mini or GPT-4.1?

GPT-5.4 mini has the larger context window (1,047,576 vs 400,000 tokens). Neither model publishes a long-context surcharge.

Do both models support prompt caching?

GPT-5.4 mini bills cached reads at $0.075 per 1M; GPT-4.1 at $0.50.

Related comparisons

Run your own token volumes