Verified October 2026

Home › Compare › GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.5

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.5

A straight cost comparison of GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified October 2026.

$4GPT-5.6 Sol input / 1M
$5GPT-5.5 input / 1M
28%Blended price gap
GPT-5.6 SolCheaper blended

Rate-by-rate comparison

USD per 1M tokens · October 2026
MetricGPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.5Winner
Input / 1M$4$5GPT-5.6 Sol
Cached input / 1M$0.40$0.50GPT-5.6 Sol
Cache write / 1M$5—GPT-5.5
Output / 1M$20$30GPT-5.6 Sol
Context window1,050,0001,050,000Tie
Batch APIYesYesTie
Long-context tier> 272,000> 272,000—

For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.

Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output

ModelBlended costDifference
GPT-5.6 Sol$9Cheaper
GPT-5.5$12.50+$3.50

Three workloads, two bills

WorkloadGPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.5Winner
Support chat
1,000 requests · 4K input / 600 output
$28$38GPT-5.6 Sol
RAG with caching
1,000 requests · 50K input (45K cached) / 1K output
$58.21$77.70GPT-5.6 Sol
Nightly batch job
10,000 requests · 10K input / 2K output
$400$550GPT-5.6 Sol

Which one should you pick?

GPT-5.6 Sol wins on support chat, cached RAG, nightly batch job, while GPT-5.5 wins on none of the three workloads above.

Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($4 vs $5); output rate ($20 vs $30); cached-input rate ($0.40 vs $0.50); cache-write rate ($5 vs —).

Batch mode is available on GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5, which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.6 Sol cheaper than GPT-5.5?

On a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, GPT-5.6 Sol is cheaper by 28% ($9 vs $12.50). The gap changes for cache-heavy prompts and for batch jobs, as the workload table shows.

Which handles longer prompts, GPT-5.6 Sol or GPT-5.5?

Both models share the same 1,050,000-token context window. Watch the long-context threshold on GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5: rates rise once input passes it.

Do both models support prompt caching?

GPT-5.6 Sol bills cached reads at $0.40 per 1M; GPT-5.5 at $0.50.

Related comparisons

Run your own token volumes