Verified October 2026

Home › Compare › Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

A straight cost comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Google Gemini) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified October 2026.

$2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) input / 1M
$1.32DeepSeek V4 Pro input / 1M
54%Blended price gap
DeepSeek V4 ProCheaper blended

Rate-by-rate comparison

USD per 1M tokens · October 2026
MetricGemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)DeepSeek V4 ProWinner
Input / 1M$2$1.32DeepSeek V4 Pro
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.044DeepSeek V4 Pro
Cache write / 1M——Tie
Output / 1M$12$3.96DeepSeek V4 Pro
Context window1,000,0001,000,000Tie
Batch APIYesNoGemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
Long-context tier> 200,000None—

For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.

Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output

ModelBlended costDifference
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)$5+$2.69
DeepSeek V4 Pro$2.31Cheaper

Three workloads, two bills

WorkloadGemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)DeepSeek V4 ProWinner
Support chat
1,000 requests · 4K input / 600 output
$15.20$7.66DeepSeek V4 Pro
RAG with caching
1,000 requests · 50K input (45K cached) / 1K output
$31.08$12.60DeepSeek V4 Pro
Nightly batch job
10,000 requests · 10K input / 2K output
$220$211DeepSeek V4 Pro

Which one should you pick?

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) wins on none of the three workloads above, while DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on support chat, cached RAG, nightly batch job.

Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($2 vs $1.32); output rate ($12 vs $3.96); cached-input rate ($0.20 vs $0.044); batch support (yes vs no); long-context tier (yes, above 200,000 vs none).

Batch mode is available on Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview), which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro?

On a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper by 54% ($2.31 vs $5). The gap changes for cache-heavy prompts and for batch jobs, as the workload table shows.

Which handles longer prompts, Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Both models share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Watch the long-context threshold on Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview): rates rise once input passes it.

Do both models support prompt caching?

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) bills cached reads at $0.20 per 1M; DeepSeek V4 Pro at $0.044.

Related comparisons

Run your own token volumes