Verified November 2026

Home › Compare › DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Large

A straight cost comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) and Mistral Large (Mistral AI), per 1,000,000 tokens, verified November 2026.

$1.32DeepSeek V4 Pro input / 1M
$2Mistral Large input / 1M
34%Blended price gap
DeepSeek V4 ProCheaper blended

Rate-by-rate comparison

USD per 1M tokens · November 2026
MetricDeepSeek V4 ProMistral LargeWinner
Input / 1M$1.32$2DeepSeek V4 Pro
Cached input / 1M$0.044$0.20DeepSeek V4 Pro
Cache write / 1M——Tie
Output / 1M$3.96$6DeepSeek V4 Pro
Context window1,000,000128,000DeepSeek V4 Pro
Batch APINoYesMistral Large
Long-context tierNoneNone—

For per-token metrics, the lower number wins. For context window and batch support, the higher or broader option wins. A dash means the provider does not publish that rate: a missing cache-write fee means writes are not billed per token, while a missing cached-input rate means cache hits bill at the full input rate.

Blended cost: 1M input + 250K output

ModelBlended costDifference
DeepSeek V4 Pro$2.31Cheaper
Mistral Large$3.50+$1.19

Ten workloads, two bills

The same two models, priced across ten workloads that differ only in their input:output ratio. Nothing else changes — no retries, no system prompt, no middleware.

WorkloadDeepSeek V4 ProMistral LargeWinner
Classification
100K reqs · 500 in / 10 out
$69.96$106DeepSeek V4 Pro
Data extraction
10K reqs · 2K in / 200 out
$34.32$52DeepSeek V4 Pro
Support chat
1K reqs · 4K in / 600 out
$7.66$11.60DeepSeek V4 Pro
Code review
2K reqs · 8K in / 1.5K out
$33$50DeepSeek V4 Pro
Summarisation
1K reqs · 20K in / 1K out
$30.36$46DeepSeek V4 Pro
Agent loop
5K reqs · 12K in / 2K out
$119$180DeepSeek V4 Pro
Translation
500 reqs · 15K in / 15K out
$39.60$60DeepSeek V4 Pro
Long-document QA
200 reqs · 120K in / 800 out
$32.31$48.96DeepSeek V4 Pro
Cached RAG
1K reqs · 50K in (45K cached) / 1K out
$12.60$25.08DeepSeek V4 Pro
Nightly batch
10K reqs · 10K in / 2K out
$211$160Mistral Large

DeepSeek V4 Pro wins 9 of 10, Mistral Large wins 1 of 10. The winner is set by the token mix, not by the headline rate.

Where the two bills cross over

DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on both sides of the mix: $1.32 vs $2 per million input tokens, and $3.96 vs $6 per million output. No input:output ratio reverses that, so on price alone the other model never becomes the better choice — it has to win on context, latency or output quality.

Cost at four scales

The same support-chat workload (4K input, 600 output per request) at four monthly volumes.

Requests / monthDeepSeek V4 ProMistral LargeDifference
100$0.766$1.16DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper by $0.394
1,000$7.66$11.60DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper by $3.94
10,000$76.56$116DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper by $39.44
100,000$766$1,160DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper by $394

What caching does to each bill

Caching only helps the part of the prompt that repeats. This is the support-chat workload (1,000 requests, 4,000 input tokens each) with an increasing share of that prompt served from a warm cache, written once on the first request.

Cached share of the promptDeepSeek V4 ProMistral LargeWinner
0%$7.66$11.60DeepSeek V4 Pro
50%$5.11$8DeepSeek V4 Pro
80%$3.58$5.85DeepSeek V4 Pro
95%$2.81$4.77DeepSeek V4 Pro

Both models publish a cached-read rate, so the discount is comparable: DeepSeek V4 Pro reads cache at $0.044 per million, Mistral Large at $0.20.

Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on classification, data extraction, support chat, code review, summarisation, agent loop, translation, long-document qa, cached rag, while Mistral Large wins on nightly batch.

Beyond price, the two differ on input rate ($1.32 vs $2); output rate ($3.96 vs $6); cached-input rate ($0.044 vs $0.20); context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000); batch support (no vs yes).

Batch mode is available on Mistral Large, which halves the nightly job. Both publish cached-input discounts, so a stable system prompt is worth caching on either.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper than Mistral Large?

On a blended 1M-input-plus-250K-output workload, DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper by 34% ($2.31 vs $3.50). The gap changes for cache-heavy prompts and for batch jobs, as the workload table shows.

Which handles longer prompts, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Mistral Large?

Mistral Large has the larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Neither model publishes a long-context surcharge.

Do both models support prompt caching?

DeepSeek V4 Pro bills cached reads at $0.044 per 1M; Mistral Large at $0.20.

Related comparisons

Run your own token volumes